Change

Adapt, cope, remain flexible and foster a positive attitude amidst life's ups and downs.

Monday, February 11, 2019

Saturday, February 9, 2019

Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade op.35 - Leif Segerstam - Sinfónica de Galicia


  

Rimsky-Korsakov: Scheherazade op.35 - Leif Segerstam - Sinfónica de Galicia

NIKOLAI RIMSKI-KÓRSAKOV (1844-1908)
Scheherazade, op. 35


 Introducción. El mar. El barco de Simbad (00:05)

La historia del príncipe Kalender (12:03
El joven príncipe y la princesa (25:10
Fiesta en Bagdad. El mar. El barco de Simbad naufraga al chocar contra una roca en cuya cima se halla un herrero de bronce (37:18

 Orquesta Sinfónica de Galicia
Leif Segerstam, director
Slava Chestiglazov, concertino

http://www.sinfonicadegalicia.com
https://twitter.com/osggalicia
https://www.facebook.com/sinfonicadeg... 
Grabación realizada en el Palacio de la Ópera de A Coruña, el 15 de mayo de 2015 
Realización de Antonio Cid/RDC 
Producciones
Ingeniero de sonido: 
Pablo Barreiro (CRTVG)





Chief Seattle/Quotes

 
All things share the same breath - the beast, the tree, the man... the air shares its spirit with all the life it supports.
 
Take only memories, leave nothing but footprints.
 
Man does not weave this web of life. He is merely a strand of it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.  


Chief Seattle/Quotes
 
 

Statement on surrendering tribal lands to Isaac Stevens, governor of Washington Territory (1855)

(NB: see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Seattle for historical details of this statement, which states "Chief Seattle gave a speech in January 1854 that was reported by Dr. Henry A. Smith in the Seattle Sunday Star in 1887. It is most usually called Seattle's Reply since it was a response to a speech by Territorial Governor Isaac I. Stevens. While there is no question that Chief Seattle gave a speech on this occasion, the accuracy of Smith's account is doubtful.").
  • My people are few. They resemble the scattering trees of a storm-swept plain...There was a time when our people covered the land as the waves of a wind-ruffled sea cover its shell-paved floor, but that time long since passed away with the greatness of tribes that are now but a mournful memory.
  • At night when the streets of your cities and villages are silent and you think them deserted, they will throng with the returning hosts that once filled them and still love this beautiful land. The white man will never be alone.




Link: https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Chief_Seattle




Short Stories, Reviews and Vintage Miscellany


Home
About Me
Anthologies
Articles
Fiction I
Fiction II
Paintings
Poems
Reviews
 


Requiem for a Nun ~ A Capsule Book Review  

  

Requiem for a Nun ~ A Capsule Book Review By Allen Kopp

William Faulkner, the master of twentieth century Southern American gothic writing, wrote Requiem for a Nun as a sort of sequel to his novel Sanctuary, meaning that it’s a brief glimpse into the life of fallen woman Temple Drake eight years after the close of Sanctuary. Requiem for a Nun was written around 1951, when Faulkner was 54 years old, about twenty years after Sanctuary.

Requiem for a Nun is an odd little book, not a traditional novel. The story is told in dramatic form, meaning that reading it is like reading a play. That’s not all, though. The “acts” of the novel are interspersed with some of Faulkner’s dense prose; dense in the sense that sentences are frequently half-a-page long or longer, and you won’t know what he’s saying unless you’re reading carefully and go back and break down the sentences into their various parts. Faulkner is the master of interjectional writing. Great writer though he was, it’s as if his mind was so twisted with interweaving thoughts that he couldn’t finish one thought before he started in on another. I suppose this is part of his “innovation,” although not easy on the reader.

The “narrative” portions of the book that are interspersed with the “dramatic” portions are about the fictional history of the fictional town of Jefferson, Mississippi, in fictional Yoknapatawpha County; specifically the jail, the courthouse, and how the town was begun. These fictional historical details actually have nothing to do with the “story” told in dramatic form.

Readers familiar with the character Temple Drake from Faulkner’s earlier novel Sanctuary know that she ended badly. She was witness to a murder and lied on the witness stand to defend the real murderer, a deformed thug named Popeye, who took her to Memphis and set her up in a whorehouse to keep her from going to the police and telling them what she knew. Requiem for a Nun picks up her story eight years later. She is free of Popeye (he was hanged for another crime that he apparently was innocent of) and is married to her drunken male companion, Gowan Stevens, from Sanctuary. They have two children, an infant daughter and a slightly older son.

Temple has taken a black woman named Nancy Mannigoe, former drug addict and prostitute, into her house as a sort of governess for her two small children. Temple believes she is saving Nancy from her terrible life and giving her a chance to have a better one. When the action of Requiem for a Nun begins, Nancy has murdered Temple and Gowan’s baby daughter in her crib and is going to be executed in a few days for her crime. Temple decides within two days of Nancy’s execution that she herself is responsible for the murder of her own baby, beginning with her actions eight years earlier, and attempts to save Nancy’s life. There is one very long scene where she and her husband’s lawyer uncle go and see the governor of the state in the state capital in the middle of the night to plead for Nancy’s life, even though Temple knows there is no use.

Since there is no nun in Requiem for a Nun, I’m not sure what the title means, although I’m figuring it refers to Nancy Mannigoe. She goes to her death serenely because she believes she deserves to die and because she is a “believer.” Nancy’s serenity is something that Temple Drake cannot touch, understand or share. She is a tormented woman and we get the distinct impression that she will never be anything but that.



 



Copyright © 2013 by Allen Kopp





Link: https://literaryfictions.com/reviews/requiem-for-a-nun-a-capsule-book-review/





Changing Worlds

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changing Worlds is a great concept and not unlike the idea of reincarnation.  Better if you don't like the idea of returning to this revolving slaughter house.



Not to laugh, not to lament, not to curse, but to understand.  - Spinoza

I drink not from mere joy in wine nor to scoff at faith -- no, only to forget myself for a moment, that only do I want of of intoxication, that alone.  - Omar Khayyam




Changing Worlds is a great concept and not unlike the idea of reincarnation.  Better if you don't like the idea of returning to this revolving slaughter house.


Not to laugh, not to lament, not to curse, but to understand.  - Spinoza

I drink not from mere joy in wine nor to scoff at faith -- no, only to forget myself for a moment, that only do I want of of intoxication, that alone.  - Omar Khayyam






Thursday, January 24, 2019

Warren Buffett’s “20 Slot” Rule:

Tuesday, January 22, 2019

Snowfall Woodblock Print



"Within
A light snow
Three thousand Realms
Within those realms
Light snow falls"
Ryokan Taigu (image: Hasui Kawase)




Your vision will become clear only when you can look into your own heart. Who looks outside, dreams, who looks inside awakes. ~ Carl Jung


We have art so as not to die of the truth.    Friedrich Nietzsche
 


"Our notions about happiness entrap us. We forget they're just ideas. Our idea of happiness can prevent us from actually being happy." TNH
 


“The mind, once stretched by a new idea, never returns to its original dimensions.” - Ralph Waldo Emerson
 "I never change, I simply become more myself." Joyce Carol Oates


Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something. ~ Plato


The longer we dwell on our misfortunes, the greater is their power to harm us. ~Voltaire
 
   



How energy can be generated, stored, bought, sold and used, all at the local level.


This New York lets residents give or sell to each other through a -powered microgrid allowing residents to bypass the power company. 

We have the solutions to the

 

LO3 Energy is developing blockchain based innovations to revolutionize how energy can be generated, stored, bought, sold and used, all at the local level.

Monday, November 26, 2018

Share your inspiration with others


Keep your fears to Yourself, butShare your inspiration with others
-- Robert Louis Stevenson




Sinclair Lewis/Quotes 

When facism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.
Winter is not a season, it's an occupation.
It is impossible to discourage the real writers - they don't give a damn what you say, they're going to write.
What is love? It is the morning and the evening star.
Advertising is a valuable economic factor because it is the cheapest way of selling goods, particularly if the goods are worthless.
Intellectually I know that America is no better than any other country; emotionally I know she is better than every other country.
People will buy anything that is one to a customer.
There are two insults no human being will endure: that he has no sense of humor, and that he has never known trouble.
Our American professors like their literature clear and cold and pure and very dead.
Pugnacity is a form of courage, but a very bad form.










Friday, November 16, 2018

‘No Morals’: Advertisers React to Facebook Report




One senior adviser in advertising suggested that Facebook should establish an ombudsman role to assess and report on its societal risks in regular financial filings.CreditCreditPhilippe Wojazer/Reuters




‘No Morals’: Advertisers React to Facebook Report




By Sapna Maheshwari
Nov. 15, 2018


Advertisers are the financial engine of Facebook, but lately the relationship had gotten rocky.

It got rockier on Thursday.

Several top marketers were openly critical of the tech giant, a day after The New York Times published an investigation detailing how Facebook’s top executives — Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg — made the company’s growth a priority while ignoring and hiding warning signs over how its data and power were being exploited to disrupt elections and spread toxic content. The article also spotlighted a lobbying campaign overseen by Ms. Sandberg, who also oversees advertising, that sought to shift public anger to Facebook’s critics and rival tech firms.

The revelations may be “the straw that breaks the camel’s back,” said Rishad Tobaccowala, chief growth officer for the Publicis Groupe, one of the world’s biggest ad companies. “Now we know Facebook will do whatever it takes to make money. They have absolutely no morals.”

Marketers have grumbled about Facebook in the past, concerned that advertisements could appear next to misinfor

mation and hate speech on the platform. They have complained about how the company handles consumer data and how it measures ads and its user base. But those issues were not enough to outweigh the lure of Facebook’s vast audience and the company’s insistence that it was trying to address its flaws.




And after this article was published online, Mr. Tobaccowala called The New York Times to add to his comments.

“The people there do,” he said, referring to possessing morals, “but as a business, they seem to have lost their compass.”

And while ad agencies or their holding companies, like Publicis, place money on behalf of brands, it is up to the brands to decide whether to advertise on Facebook.

“Agencies can make recommendations, but marketers need to decide at what point is this going to be a liability for them,” said Marla Kaplowitz, chief executive of the 4A’s, an industry trade group.

So far, very few have been willing to leave the platform.

“Advertisers have long taken the position that Facebook was gamed by third parties and bad actors but had always believed that Facebook was taking whatever steps it could to prevent that,” said Rob Norman, a senior adviser at GroupM, the media buying arm of the ad giant WPP, and a longtime industry watcher.





Mr. Norman said Facebook should establish an ombudsman role to assess its societal risks, with reports in its regular financial filings. He compared the work to an accounting firm’s audit of a corporation’s finances.

“The business should be obliged to report its risk to society versus just financial risks to the business,” Mr. Norman said.

“We’ve made mistakes, but to suggest that we aren’t focused on uncovering and tackling issues quickly is not true,” Carolyn Everson, the vice president of global marketing solutions at Facebook, said in an emailed statement. “Our clients depend on us to help drive their business, and whether that means supporting the largest brands in the world or budding entrepreneurs, we’ll stay focused on doing the best work for our partners, improving safety and security across our platforms, and driving social good in the world.”

Almost all of Facebook’s revenue — which climbed to just over $40 billion last year — comes from advertisers, which range from local businesses to global brands. Along with Google, Facebook dominates the digital advertising market, and even as user growth has slowed, its revenue has risen quarter after quarter. But marketing is built on trust between sellers and buyers, and the revelations this week are a jolt for some in the industry.

“Up to now, whatever you said about Facebook, you couldn’t say it was a two-faced company,” Mr. Tobaccowala said. “It says one thing to you and does something completely different. This is very hard if you are a marketer.”

He added: “I’m not anti-Facebook. But I have always believed that marketers need people who recognize their dollars, and that they should drive and control their brands and they should control their data, and I think this will probably give them additional gumption to stand up and be heard.”

R/GA, a digital agency that won an advertising award from Facebook last year, posted a link to the Times article on Twitter and added, “It’s time to admit we were all wrong about Facebook. It’s actually worse.” The agency declined to comment further.


Dave Morgan, the founder and chief executive of Simulmedia, which works with advertisers on targeted television ads, said the reports about Facebook’s behavior “are driving a lot of pretty intense conversations in the ad industry these days.”

“What I hear most are brands saying that time for just talking is over: ‘It’s no longer about what Facebook says, it’s about what they do and what they stop doing,’” he said.

Keith Weed, the chief marketing officer for Unilever, created a stir this year when he said the company would not invest in platforms or environments “which create division in society, and promote anger or hate.” Unilever, one of the world’s biggest advertisers and the owner of brands like Dove and Lipton, said it would “prioritize investing only in responsible platforms that are committed to creating a positive impact in society.”

Unilever did not respond to a request for comment on Thursday.



“So far, the track record basically has been that regardless of what Facebook does, they keep getting more money,” Mr. Tobaccowala said. “The question simply is, will this make people wake up?”


Email Sapna Maheshwari at sapna@nytimes.com or follow her on Twitter: @sapna.


A version of this article appears in print on Nov. 15, 2018, on Page B4 of the New York edition with the headline: ‘No Morals’: Advertisers Voice Criticism of Tech Giant. 




Related Coverage


Delay, Deny and Deflect: How Facebook’s Leaders Fought Through CrisisNov. 14, 2018

Damage Control at Facebook: 6 Takeaways From The Times’s Investigation Nov. 14, 2018






Link: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/15/business/media/facebook-advertisers.html




Wednesday, November 14, 2018

Change is a constant

  

To begin a new you must say farewell to who you once were. To open a new door you must close an old one first. That can be heartbreaking and scary, but it is necessary if you are to change and grow. Say goodbye to the old you and rise up as a stronger and more magical you.











Sunday, November 11, 2018

The Problem With Being Perfect


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
When the psychologist Jessica Pryor lived near an internationally renowned university, she once saw a student walking into a library holding a sleeping bag and a coffee maker.
She’s heard of grad students spending 12 to 18 hours at a time in the lab. Their schedules are meant to be literally punishing: If they’re scientists-in-training, they won’t allow themselves to watch Netflix until their experiments start generating results. “Relationships become estranged—people stop inviting them to things, which leads them to spend even more time in the lab,” Pryor told me.
Along with other therapists, Pryor, who is now with the Family Institute at Northwestern University, is trying to sound the alarm about a tendency among young adults and college students to strive for perfection in their work—sometimes at any cost. Though it is often portrayed as a positive trait—a clever response to the “greatest weaknesses” question during job interviews, for instance—Pryor and others say extreme perfectionism can lead to depression, anxiety, and even suicidal ideation.


What’s more, perfectionism seems to be on the rise. In a study of thousands of American, Canadian, and British college students published earlier this year,


What’s more, perfectionism seems to be on the rise. In a study of thousands of American, Canadian, and British college students published earlier this year, Thomas Curran of the University of Bath and Andrew Hill of York St. John University found that today’s college students report higher levels of perfectionism than college students did during the 1990s or early 2000s. They measured three types of perfectionism: self-oriented, or a desire to be perfect; socially prescribed, or a desire to live up to others’ expectations; and other-oriented, or holding others to unrealistic standards. From 1989 to 2016, they found, self-oriented perfectionism scores increased by 10 percent, socially prescribed scores rose by 33 percent, and other-oriented perfectionism increased by 16 percent.

A person living with an other-oriented perfectionist might feel criticized by the perfectionist spouse for not doing household chores exactly the “right” way. “One of the most common things couples argue about is the proper way of loading the dishwasher,” says Amy Bach, a psychologist in Providence, Rhode Island.
Curran describes socially prescribed perfectionism as “My self-esteem is contingent on what other people think.” His study didn’t examine the causal reasons for its rise, but he posits that the rise of both standardized testing and social media might play a role. These days, LinkedIn alerts us when our rival gets a new job, and Instagram can let us know how well “liked” our lives are compared with a friend’s.
In an opinion piece earlier this year, Curran and Hill argue that society has also become more dog-eat-dog. “Over the last 50 years, communal interest and civic responsibility have been progressively eroded,” they write, “replaced by a focus on self-interest and competition in a supposedly free and open marketplace.” We strive for perfection, it seems, because we feel we must in order to get ahead.
Michael Brustein, a clinical psychologist in Manhattan, says when he first began practicing in 2007, he was surprised by how prevalent perfectionism was among his clients, despite how little his graduate training had focused on the phenomenon. He sees perfectionism in, among others, clients who are entrepreneurs, artists, and tech employees. “You’re in New York because you’re ambitious, you have this need to strive,” he says. “But then your whole identity gets wrapped into a goal.”
Perfectionism can, of course, be a positive force. Think of professional athletes, who train aggressively for ever-higher levels of competition. In well-adjusted perfectionism, someone who doesn’t get the gold is able to forget the setback and move on. In maladaptive perfectionism, meanwhile, people make an archive of all their failures. They revisit these archives constantly, thinking, as Pryor puts it, “I need to make myself feel terrible so I don’t do this again.”
Then they double down, “raising the expectation bar even higher, which increases the likelihood of defeat, which makes you self-critical, so you raise the bar higher, work even harder,” she says.
Next comes failure, shame, and pushing yourself even harder toward even higher and more impossible goals. Meeting them becomes an “all or nothing” premise. Pryor offered this example: “Even if I’m an incredible attorney, if I don’t make partner in the same pacing as one of my colleagues, clearly that means I’m a failure.”

Brustein says his perfectionist clients tend to devalue their accomplishments, so that every time a goal is achieved, the high lasts only a short time, like “a gas tank with a hole in it.” If the boss says you did a great job, it’s because he doesn’t know anything. If the audience likes your work, that’s because it’s too stupid to know what good art actually is.
Brustein says his perfectionist clients tend to devalue their accomplishments, so that every time a goal is achieved, the high lasts only a short time, like “a gas tank with a hole in it.” If the boss says you did a great job, it’s because he doesn’t know anything. If the audience likes your work, that’s because it’s too stupid to know what good art actually is.

But, therapists say, there are also different ways perfectionism manifests. Some perfectionists are the sleeping-bag-toting self-flagellants, always pushing themselves forward. But others actually fall behind on work, unable to complete assignments unless they’re, well, perfect. Or they might self-sabotage, handicapping their performance ahead of time. They’re the ones partying until 2 a.m. the night before the final, so that when the C rolls in, there’s a ready excuse. Anything to avoid facing your own imperfections.
While educators and parents have successfully convinced students of the need to be high performing and diligent, the experts told me, they haven’t adequately prepared them for the inevitability of failure. Instead of praises like “You’re so smart,” parents and educators should say things like “You really stuck with it,” Pryor says, to emphasize the value of tenacity over intrinsic talent.
Pryor notes that many of her clients are wary she’ll “turn them into some degenerate couch potato and teach them to be okay with it.” Instead, she tries to help them think through the parts of their perfectionism they’d like to keep, and to lose the parts that are ruining their lives.
Bach, who sees many students from Brown University, says some of them don’t even go out on weekends, let alone weekdays. She tells them, “Aim high, but get comfortable with good enough.” When they don’t get some internship or award, she encourages them to remember that “one outcome is not a basis for a broad conclusion about the person’s intelligence, qualifications, or potential for the future.”
The treatment for perfectionism might be as simple as having patients keep logs of things they can be proud of, or having them behave imperfectly in small ways, just to see how it feels. “We might have them hang the towels crooked or wear some clothing inside out,” says Martin Antony, a professor in the department of psychology at Ryerson University in Toronto.
Brustein likes to get his perfectionist clients to create values that are important to them, then try to shift their focus to living according to those values rather than achieving specific goals. It’s a play on the “You really stuck with it” message for kids. In other words, it isn’t about doing a headstand in yoga class; it’s about going to yoga class in the first place, because you like to be the kind of person who takes care of herself.
But he warns that some people go into therapy expecting too much—an instant transformation of themselves from a pathological perfectionist to a (still high-achieving) non-perfectionist.
They try to be perfect, in other words, at no longer being perfect.
We want to hear what you think about this article. Submit a letter to the editor or write to letters@theatlantic.com.